I'm sick of people calling us a Narcisstic society. We are far beter than 25, or 50 years ago
SunMan Wednesday, February 24, 2010 0 comments
Initial iPad Demand Greater Than Initial iPhone Demand, Because of iPhone!
interest in Apple's upcoming iPad than when the iPhone was released.
Abramsky, the RBC analyst, says this is because is pricepoint and
other items like this. Though I am sure those were strong factors, the reason the iPad uptake
will be stronger than the iPhone's launch, is, well BECAUSE of the
iPhone. When the iPhone launched, noone knew how good apple would be
inthe mobility space. With the incredible user experience and product
they created over the past 3 years on this platform, people are
anticipating the iPad. No doubt this is the main reason. http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100223/initial-ipad-demand-greater-than-initial-iphone-demand/?mod=ATD_iphone
SunMan Tuesday, February 23, 2010 0 comments
Is Apple done with laptops?
SunMan Monday, February 22, 2010 0 comments
Pushing students to college after 10th grade? Is this the right thing?
SunMan Wednesday, February 17, 2010 0 comments
Friedman: Climate Scientists need to be on the offensive, rather than always defensive
SunMan 0 comments
Steve Jobs Preps His Own iBook (to promote iPad!)
SunMan Tuesday, February 16, 2010 0 comments
Looks like Adobe has decided to 'join 'em' and find way around flash with air on ipad
SunMan 0 comments
Healthcare: Wash hands, save lives. Or can technology solve the problem?
HOSPITAL workers often have to wash their hands dozens of times a day — and may need a minute or more to do the process right, by scrubbing with soap and water. But new devices could reduce the task to just four seconds, cleaning even hard-to-reach areas under fingernails.
Instead of scrubbing, the workers would put their hands into a small box that bathes them with plasma — the same sort of luminous gas found in neon signs, fluorescent tubes and TV displays. This plasma, though, is at room temperature and pressure, and is engineered to zap germs, including the drug-resistant supergerm MRSA.
The technology is being developed in several laboratories. Gregor Morfill, who created several prototypes using the technology at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany, says the plasma quickly inactivates not only bacteria but also viruses and fungi.
Dr. Morfill and his colleagues have tested their devices on hands and feet. “It works on athlete’s foot,” he said. “And the nice thing is, you don’t have to take your socks off. They are disinfected, too.” (The cleaning takes a bit longer when socks are added to the job, he said — about 25 seconds. “And it doesn’t yet work through shoes,” he added.)
Plasmas engineered to zap microorganisms aren’t new. During the last decade, they have come into use to sterilize some medical instruments. But using them on human tissue is another matter, said Mark Kushner, director of the Michigan Institute for Plasma Science and Engineering and a professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. “Many thousands of volts drive the generation of plasma,” he said, “and normally one doesn’t want to touch thousands of volts.” But the design of the new hand sanitizers, he said, protects people from doing so. Reassured by that design, about five years ago he put his naked thumb into a jet of microbe-destroying plasma at the lab of another plasma researcher.
“It was just one of those leaps of faith,” he said. (His thumb survived just fine.)
Research in the field of plasma medicine has grown quickly in the last decade, with at least 50 groups worldwide working on medical uses, Professor Kushner estimated.
He said that there were many documented cases of plasmas being applied for sanitizing skin or other body parts, and “for speeding the rate of blood clotting in wound healing.”
“Plasmas turn out to have beneficial effects,” he said.
Dr. Morfill, who has a plasma research laboratory inside the international space station, took an unusual route to studying medical uses of plasmas. He was researching the natural plasmas of space, including the charged dust in Saturn’s rings, and decided to develop plasmas for health on earth.
He has developed several prototypes of hand-cleaning devices that can be mounted on walls, as well as a portable, battery-operated model the size of a large electric toothbrush. Companies are interested in manufacturing the devices, he said, which may one day be particularly useful in developing countries where medical services can be scarce.
The devices can probably be built for $100 or less, as no expensive parts are used, he said.
The plasma cleaners make their antibacterial cocktails by running electrical current through air, said David B. Graves, a professor of chemical engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, who has worked on low-temperature plasma applications for 25 years.
Professor Graves is doing computer simulations of the chemical reactions that occur in the Morfill plasmas. The electric current ionizes the oxygen, nitrogen and water vapor in the air, he said, eventually creating the nitric oxide, hydrogen peroxide and particles that are so effective against bacteria, viruses and fungi.
Many other cleaning applications of plasma are being researched. In addition to hand sanitizers, Michael G. Kong, a professor of bioelectrics engineering at Loughborough University in Leicestershire, England, has developed a prototype for plasma jets that can be built into air-conditioning systems. As air is transmitted through the system from one hospital room to another, for example, the jets inactivate microorganisms, fungi and viruses in the air.
IN the Netherlands, Gerrit M. W. Kroesen, a professor of plasma physics at the Eindhoven University of Technology, is focusing on the treatment of burn wounds. “We have seen that plasmas help with disinfection,” he said. “They also stimulate regeneration of tissue.”
The first products to reach hospitals, after surface cleaners and instrument disinfectants, will probably be hand sanitizers, said Alexander Fridman, a professor and director of the Drexel Plasma Institute at Drexel University in Philadelphia.
“Hand sanitizers are the low-hanging fruit here,” he said, as their safety can be demonstrated relatively easily.
But other potential applications, including treatment of burns or cancers, are further away. “We are able to do miracles with this technology,” he said, “but we have to make sure the treatments are not toxic.”
E-mail: novelties@nytimes.com.
More Articles in Business » A version of this article appeared in print on February 14, 2010, on page BU5 of the New York edition.
Researchers at various universities are developing technology to better clean and disinfect hands. As US Hospital continue to up the ante in preventing spread of infection, that have focused on washing hands as a primary culprit. Germs and disease easily pass from patient, to hospital worker, to the next patient with all the poking and prodding required. But is more technology really needed, or it is overkill?
Reviewing the situations, the problem does not occur in surgery. Doctors and nurses take sterility incredibly seriously and wash hands to the hilt when going in and out of sterile rooms. Once again, it is not the acute, dramatic area of the hospital where problems occur. It is in the routine, day to day care of patients in their beds. Healthcare workers go from bed to bed, room to room, giving patients pills, examining, touching, responding to quick alerts. This is where the problem occurs.
As Atul Gawande says (paraphrasing): "There is no better technique for washing hands or length of time needed in washing hands. Its very simple: wash your hands 100% of the time when you are supposed to; not 80%, not 90%. But 100% of the time. Then this problem quickly dissappears."
At Mobile Aspects, though for different healthcare issues, we develop technologies that ensure the routine happens, not 80% of the time, not 90% of the time, but 100% of the time. And if the routine does not occur, we provide an alert instantaneously to make people aware of the situation. Steps are minimized, saving people time, and each step is electronically documented and shared with other systems that need the information.
My questions here is: If people are not washing their hands with a simple solution of soap and water, will they put their hands into this machine to sterilize them? Unless it automatically sterilizes your whole body as you walk into and out of a room (ooh! bright idea bulb), I think this will be an expensive fix that doesnt work.
As often in healthcare, we have the technology to save millions and millions of lives in very acute conditions. This is not where problems occur. It is not the people either. It is the system - in this case, we must train people to wash their hands each and every time they enter and leave a room, absolutely, 100% of the time. This will solve 80% of the problem with very litter effort (80/20 rule). Then, expensive technology such as detailed above can be used in situation where it still does not solve the problem.
SunMan Monday, February 15, 2010 0 comments
Toyota, Honda problems: Is this the tipping point for Detroit comeback?
The US car makers have been crowing for a few years that their quality has improved dramatically over the last decade, but it wasn't having an effect on sales. I actually got worried that Detroit may start abandoning quality for short term profits again. What they didn't realize is that a quality reputation is not something that you can obtain for having a good year or batch of cars. It's something that you have to earn over a long period of time.
I think Detroit actually had started to earn the reputation for quality cars a couple of years ago when we purchased our last car: a Toyota Camry Hybrid, *ahem*. It was there in the back of my and my wife's mind, but we weren't ready to buy Detroit yet.
As of two years ago, Detroit started to be thought of as good cars again. But there were still too many horrifyingly ugly American cars on the road. And the interiors? Nasty, big buttoned, move back the whole front bench mentality was still in my mind (my parents owned an '88 cutlass Ciera, of the burgundy variety). We stuck with Toyota, Honda, and even Nissan. And further, we wanted to help the environment, so Toyota took the lead. With a small family, the Camry Hybrid was perfect. Roomy, quality (at the time), nice mpg's (33 city, 40 highway) and all the technology gadgets.
6 months ago, if we were to buy a new car, I actually could think American. I think part was patriotic, especially during the downturn; part was Ford not taking bailouts. But by then American cars actually started having a reputation for quality. Now, throw in that GM was putting out the Volt and Ford was putting out nice looking hybrids: well, at least they were in the conversation with Toyota and Honda.
I think these recalls could potentially be a tipping point. The basis for quality and cool cars had been created by Detroit over the last decade. But it is very difficult to unseat the champ from it's perch. Toyota was solid at #1 and I saw no reason how anyone could knock them down. However, with the them and Honda getting people to buy on the basis of quality, this could cause the perch to start swaying. NOW, more than ever, if Detroit can keep the momentum going, they will have a chanc to recover strongly as the American economy recovers. Let's all hope they continue to give me many reasons to prefer them over Japan. I'm reading about 'Honda expands airbag recall as more Toyotas probed' on Fluent News. Here is the link: http://fluentnews.com/s/23261933
SunMan Wednesday, February 10, 2010 0 comments
It's the Software Stupid! How Software Runs a Car and Everything Else
I am sure there are plenty of old school people who lament this new world older. Before good engineering was mechanical. Now that's only half the story. There is good and bad to everything, so software will cause some problems, as with the recent spate of Toyota issues. On the flipside, relying more on software features than mechanical features has brought incredible usability, comfort and reliabilty to products today.
As consumers we are looking at the products this way. As product developers, we need to understand this: beautifully combine hardware, engineering and software together. Don't be just good at one. If you don't you will lose. Even the car, usually a gearheads heaven, has been reduced to plugging a computer into it to diagnose and even fix problems. From The New York Times: The Dozens of Computers That Make Modern Cars Go (and Stop) Even basic vehicles have at least 30 microprocessors, controlling functions like braking, cruise control and entertainment systems. http://s.nyt.com/u/eGP
SunMan Saturday, February 6, 2010 0 comments
What Costs $282 Million an Hour? - Health Blog - WSJ
By Jacob Goldstein
The U.S. spent $2.472 trillion on health care last year, according to a paper out today in the journal Health Affairs. That’s $282 million an hour.
Health spending as a percent of GDP — a key metric that shows how much of all U.S. spending goes to health care — rose from 16.2% in 2008 to 17.3% in 2009, far higher than any other industrialized country. That’s the largest one-year increase since 1960, when the feds started closely tracking national health expenditures.
The figure went up so much because health spending continued to rise, even as the overall economy shrank. The aging population accounted for a small part of this rise, but two other factors were more important: rising prices and increasing use. Health-care prices rose by 3.2% in 2009, according to the Health Affairs paper, significantly faster than prices rose for the overall economy. Utilization, which includes both volume and intensity of health-care services, rose by 1.5%.
The share of health-care spending paid for by the government (through programs such as Medicare and Medicaid) is also rising, and is projected to cross the 50% threshold soon. A story in this morning’s WSJ looks at what the government’s rising share of health costs means for the health-care debate in Washington.
Photo: iStockphoto
Much like President Obama discussed in his 2010 State of the Union about politics, Medicine is messy. Does it have to be? Actually, yes to some extent. We are not starting from scratch. Also, we want to encourage everyone in the system to think freely and try and solve problems. When you let the mind free like that, it does create some messiness, but it fixes a lot of ailments. We also do an absolutely incredible job in the most acute of situations - people are living today from treatments that couldnt have happened just a decade ago and arent happening in most other countries at the scale we make this available to the general public. That being said, US Healthcare is far from perfect and there things we can do to bring costs down.
We do spend an inordinate amount of money on care which can be attributed to both the actual healthcare system, but also societal issues. In general, the US does not eat very healthy, does not exercise well, and we eat a lot of red meat. You can agree or disagree with whether this is a good lifestyle or not, or whether we should try to change, but this does drive our costs up. But the goal of this column is to review the system itself.
In my eyes, as the Institute of Medicine, in its famous 1999 book "To Err is Human" stated that the caregivers in the systems are inherently good and skilled. However, they have been put into a position to fail by the actual healthcare system itself. This leads to errors, resulting in injuries and death. This also leads to vast waste in the system, causing US hospitals 10's of $billions annually.
There are many factors in the system that cause both patient safety and efficiency (I'll call that "Quality Care") issues. But as I look at the problem, I see it is the routine, every day that is the problem, not large scale situations. There are three main issues at play. First, the drivers in medicine tilt the delivery of care to happen only after problems have become extremely acute. Doctors are paid, and paid extremely well, when they perform surgeries, give expensive treatments. This causes massive amounts of money to be spent in this area - this is actually partly very good: how else could we be delivering the cancer and other treatments that we can today? But the expense poured into acute problem is to the detriment of the routine. We do not solve problems before they become acute. Even the simple act of setting up an annual doctor's exam is a huge problem (when I go to the dentist, the next appointment is setup before I get out of the chair; at my PCP, as I walk out the door, the scheduler tells me his/her book doesnt go out that far and to call back in a few months!).
Second, we have a system that has pockets of information here, but incredibly inconsistent transfers of information there. Even within a particular hospital, this can become an issue. I have been involved in Healthcare IT for quite sometime. There is something wrong when the OR's in a hospital use on system for billing, and Cardiology uses a completely different system for billing (this is just one example; dont get me started). Transferring information BETWEEN hospitals? Forget it! In the age of being able to remotely start my car from an app on my iPhone, its a horror story for me to hear people bringing film xrays from one hospital to another.
Lastly, the logistics of healthcare are well behind the biologics. We have done an incredible job in the US in finding some treatment for almost every ailment imaginable. There is trillions of dollars spent annually on trying to research solutions to every thing that could affect us. However, the path that the delivery of treatment, including the patient, has to take is like we are in the 1920's. I like to say that its like driving Ferrari's on dirt roads. This last point is why founded Mobile Aspects (www.mobileaspects.com), where we have assembled top minds and hospitals to collaborate from around the globe to think about and solve these delivery problems.
There is no simple answer to "solving healthcare." A lot of it is actually politics, with all the entrenched drivers and companies and people and money, and so it can be quite messy. We cant start from scratch. However, there are ways to attack the problems in healthcare and make a significant impact immediately.
SunMan Friday, February 5, 2010 0 comments
Jon Schwartz, Sun CEO, Tweets His Resignation, Haiku Style
SunMan Thursday, February 4, 2010 0 comments
Apple allowing Apps to make free calls. AT&T embracing it.
SunMan Wednesday, February 3, 2010 0 comments


The U.S. spent $2.472 trillion on health care last year, according to a